I currently participate in scouting as a member of the Troop Committee for Troop 387 in the Thompson-Poudre District of the Longs Peak Council in the Boy Scouts of America.
Scout Links:
Following is the text of an email that I sent to her:
Subject: California Resolution 89 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:01:38 -0600 To: Assemblymember.Goldberg@assembly.ca.gov Shame on you, Jackie Goldberg, I am appalled by your sponsorship and support of of Resolution 89 in the California Legislature, a shameless political attempt to censure the Boy Scouts of America for holding opinions that differ from your own special interests. Your authority as a representative should not be abused in this manner. Lawmakers should be chief in protecting the rights of all persons who they represent--not trying to suppress them by this kind of facist political action. The Supreme court of this country has ruled that the scouts have the right to choose the leaders which reflect their own values. Although you may personally disagree with the BSA's position of not wanting homosexuals to serve as scout leaders, that does not justify this ill-concieved legislation. Perhaps you don't understand why the BSA has this position. Many people think that the scouting program is just hiking, camping and having fun in the outdoors. The scout program in intended to build character and instill values in young people while they are having fun. One of the key methods of scouting is the association of scouts with their adult leaders. We carefully choose these leaders to be examples of our values and morals. Scouting would be destroyed if we were not free to choose our own values and the leaders which represent them. Each organization who charters a BSA pack, troop, team, or crew has it's own local unit committee, which chooses men and women that it trusts to be exemplary leaders of their children. I serve on such a committee, and consider your support of this resolution an offense to all free persons. Sincerely,
Following is the text of an email that I sent to her:
To: abradstreet@cbmlaw.com Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 06:57:17 -0600 Subject: Attempt to suppress right to freely associate Dear Ms. Bradstreet, I am appalled by the attempts by the San Francisco Superior Court and the Bar Association of San Francisco to suppress the right of their own members to freely associate with the Boy Scouts of America. Your authority as president of the bar associate should not be abused in this attempt to punish those who have different opinions than yourself. Judges and laywers should be chief in protecting the rights of all people in this country--not trying to suppress them by this kind of facist political action. The Supreme court of this country has ruled that the scouts have the right to choose the leaders which reflect their own values. Although you may personally disagree with the BSA's position of not wanting homosexuals to serve as scout leaders, that does not justify this ill-concieved policy. Perhaps you don't understand why the BSA has this position. Many people think that the scouting program is just hiking, camping and having fun in the outdoors. The scout program in intended to build character and instill values in young people while they are having fun. One of the key methods of scouting is the association of scouts with their adult leaders. We carefully choose these leaders to be examples of our values and morals. Scouting would be destroyed if we were not free to choose our own values and the leaders which represent them. Each organization who charters a BSA pack, troop, team, or crew has it's own local unit committee, which chooses men and women that it trusts to be exemplary leaders of their children. Sincerely,